Symbolism Sunday, The Male
October 24, 2010
Ahh, last week we had a look at women, but I’m fair and balanced, so let’s take a peek at some men.
Quite simply, the man wasn’t the focus of idealised mourning through the 17th to the 19th centuries. Fashion and mourning items were certainly made for men and in the days when presentable jewellery was considered more usual (outside of the wedding ring), men wearing mourning rings or fashion accessories were not uncommon. If you want to read more about men and mourning fashion from the 17th to the 19th centuries, please take some time to read through my Textiles series of articles. There’s a wealth of information about male and female mourning costume and mourning custom there. However, what about the depiction of the male in Neoclassical and mourning/sentimental depictions?
Well, they’re not very common. The male as a subject in miniatures are found throughout pendants, lockets, rings and bracelets, but these are more personal. The representation of the man as an ideal is a lot harder to come by and many of the memorial pieces with the man represented are commissioned for the male who had purchased the item or a depiction of the man commissioned and worn by a family member. The man was the patriarch of the family and if a piece is displayed with this individual shown, then the outward statement of mourning is indeed profound and quite personal. The ‘idealised’ male is quite common within sentimental Neoclassical miniatures, but that’s more often relating to a classical/religious depiction or used to balance/interact with symbols surrounding (such as two lovers).
I could make a lot of sweeping statements about the female as the true ideal symbol of grief for allegoric figures in mourning depictions, but as I said, I’m fair and balanced (and I did a lot of that last week).
Tomorrow? More memorial madness!
November 24, 2010 at 8:04 am
[…] written a little bit about the male in mourning pieces and how they often skew to the more personal and unique of sentiments. Today’s look at this […]
December 5, 2010 at 8:06 am
[…] The Male […]
December 12, 2010 at 11:04 am
[…] The Male […]
December 19, 2010 at 8:57 am
[…] The Male […]
December 26, 2010 at 7:39 am
[…] The Male […]
January 4, 2011 at 10:10 am
[…] The Male […]
January 9, 2011 at 8:07 am
[…] The Male […]
January 16, 2011 at 11:01 am
[…] The Male […]
January 23, 2011 at 8:02 am
[…] The Male […]
January 30, 2011 at 8:12 am
[…] The Male […]
February 6, 2011 at 8:18 am
[…] The Male […]
February 13, 2011 at 8:04 am
[…] The Male […]
February 27, 2011 at 8:02 am
[…] The Male […]
March 9, 2011 at 7:35 pm
[…] The Male […]
March 13, 2011 at 8:05 am
[…] The Male […]
March 20, 2011 at 9:30 am
[…] The Male […]
March 27, 2011 at 8:06 am
[…] The Male […]
April 3, 2011 at 8:05 am
[…] The Male […]
April 10, 2011 at 8:28 am
[…] The Male […]
April 17, 2011 at 8:10 am
[…] The Male […]
April 24, 2011 at 8:08 am
[…] The Male […]
May 1, 2011 at 8:05 am
[…] The Male […]
May 8, 2011 at 8:13 am
[…] The Male […]
May 12, 2011 at 7:38 pm
[…] The Male […]
May 17, 2011 at 8:08 am
[…] The Male […]
May 22, 2011 at 10:52 am
[…] The Male […]
September 7, 2011 at 8:02 am
[…] The Male […]